TD a second time

This is now my second attempt at "The Darling" because according to someone words like dasfuf aren't actually words, I do not know why this person would think that, because it is definitely a word in some foreign language. How would you know? You wouldn't. Back to the matter at hand, I will start off this apparently actually read blog by stating the philosophies of ThrowEm or Thoreau and Emerson for the plebs that can't understand the way my mind works, which is most people. To give you a hint I'll say that there are a lot of unnecessary things going on in there. Their philosophies consist of self worth as seen in the works known as "Civil Disobedience" and "Self Reliance" where in those things it says "individuals have a right—even a duty—to resist unjust government actions."(Thoreau) And these swell fellows also like to do a thing in which they relay the information that states that they dislike big government and prefer small government more specifically than big government and it says that with this quote "That government is best which governs least" (Thoreau). They are also abolitionists which means they do not like slaves and stuff as seen here “I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slave’s government also” (Thoreau). The story that this blog is referring to has a bit of these philosophies strewn about it like some sort of thing that has philosophies strewn about it. It celebrates individual worth like when it says "Your'e such a darling" (Chekhov) to explain the individual that is being referred to, which is one of the few things in the story that is comparable to their writing styles and philosophies that are included in their works of words and they are indeed. It shows more individual worth when it says "My wonderful little man" (Chekhov) to describe some stuff.

"Thoreau's Civil Disobedience - 1." The Thoreau Reader. Web. 07 Feb. 2012.

Chekhov, Anton. "The Darling." Glencoe Literature: The Reader's Choice. New York, NY: Glencoe McGraw-Hill, 2000. 557-66. Print.